+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Your thoughts about this no-goal call

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    small town underground
    Posts
    2,849
    Thanks
    809
    Thanked 477 Times in 321 Posts

    Question Your thoughts about this no-goal call


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Classified
    Posts
    4,226
    Thanks
    355
    Thanked 583 Times in 324 Posts

    Default

    I have to admit, that definitely looked like it should've been a goal. But ultimately it's up to the guys up in the booth with the 50 different camera angles, so they must've seen something we didn't.

    A similar thing happened in a Habs game a couple weeks ago where the net came off the ice just enough for the puck to squeeze under. On the first few looks it was a goal, but after seeing several more angles you could see what happened. It was a little more obvious than this, but who knows.
    http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x36/jphat_sports/MLB/toronto.png

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NRW, Germany
    Posts
    5,441
    Thanks
    885
    Thanked 214 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    As I first saw that I thought it should have been of course no goal cause Auld saved it and the whistle has blown.
    But in slomotion you could see that the puck was clearly over the goal line before the whistle! Why didnt they overrule it?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    420
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 128 Times in 33 Posts

    Default

    horrrible call haha


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    College
    Posts
    1,206
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 129 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Or we can look at it this way, the Wings didn't score and that's always good
    The one constant throughout the years, has been Baseball

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    small town underground
    Posts
    2,849
    Thanks
    809
    Thanked 477 Times in 321 Posts

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    North West
    Posts
    967
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 133 Times in 58 Posts

    Default

    Yea that's brutal. If the ref is trying to whistle the play dead, he should make sure he's on point and ready to do that, not wait three seconds after the puck is in the net. That is ridiculous in my opinion.




  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    627
    Thanks
    115
    Thanked 212 Times in 82 Posts

    Default

    It's 100-percent goal. Referees like some teams. Not Detroit, not Washington.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    564
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts

    Default

    I wanna know why the coaches don't have a little red flag they can throw on the ice if there is a bogus call they want to challenge. Then if they get it wrong it costs them the timeout

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    136
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts

    Default

    I read this part :
    Murphy agreed that the puck "does go into the net on the original shot," but having not spoken to LaRue yet he could only assume that the referee lost sight of the puck when it hit goalie Alex Auld's pad and that's where the intent to blow the whistle comes into play.

    If thats the case wouldnt that of been a little 2 quick of a call lose sight, blow whistle.what about rebounds ...that is a grey area..I hate those type of calls..Ruins the game.

    LOL drum.watch much football..good idea though

    Attempting to guess what Darryl Sutter's plans are should come with a warning label: Predicting the Flames GM's moves could be hazardous to your sanity.

    Team Work Makes The Dream Work

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Classified
    Posts
    4,226
    Thanks
    355
    Thanked 583 Times in 324 Posts

    Default

    Sorry I watched it with the sound off the first time, so I didn't realize it was a whistle issue, but it's not much different. There are guys up in the booth watching this frame by frame to make sure the puck crossed the line before the whistle. There was no way you could tell for certain from any of the angles they showed in this video.

    It's really tough to fault the refs for anything here.
    http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x36/jphat_sports/MLB/toronto.png

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    College
    Posts
    1,206
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 129 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    I like this part:
    "In all cases we want to get the right call. In this case it appears we didn't," Murphy said. "But, I think sometimes when you have video review people expect perfection and that's never the case and we only let the fan down when they think it's going to be perfect. There are situations where video review can't intercede and we don't want it to intercede. I don't think you ever want video review refereeing a game.

    The advent of instant replay killed sports a little. But I'd like to reiterate what I said. This call was not a problem it hurt the Wings
    The one constant throughout the years, has been Baseball

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,827
    Thanks
    2,227
    Thanked 1,751 Times in 506 Posts

    Default

    A lot of great jokes in the hockey section lately but none of them beats this one. The best game in the world is going to the dogs...

    Another thing that kills me is that the ref overruled the big boys in Toronto... that's pretty funny too!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,061
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 1,102 Times in 152 Posts

    Default

    as much as i hate the wings, it should of been a goal, even if the ref has intentions of blowing the call dead, it was still a goal, doesn't matter if he lossed sight of the puck or not.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    small town underground
    Posts
    2,849
    Thanks
    809
    Thanked 477 Times in 321 Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for the comments
    Just can't get it how the hell those guys in toronto didn't see what it's obvious with all superturboextrahigh cameras?
    Maybe they've been watching some porn at the same time

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Karlstad, Sweden
    Posts
    29
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts

    Default

    I believe Toronto did call Joe Louis Arena and the referee told them that my intent was to blow. In which case according to Murphy they're not allowed to interfere. My question would be: "Does it take 3 seconds from thought to move your whistle to your mouth?"


  17. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    College
    Posts
    1,206
    Thanks
    85
    Thanked 129 Times in 40 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nilmadae View Post
    My question would be: "Does it take 3 seconds from thought to move your whistle to your mouth?"
    well, they are Canadians






    I kid
    The one constant throughout the years, has been Baseball

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Default

    very bad decision , maybe they didnt know when the whistle was blown.
    It cleary was a goal, but ... things like that happen sometimes.... haha bad luck ^^

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts